Menu Content/Inhalt
Home

IP Camera CAE-62A Print
April 2013

                                             
 

Features of CAE-62:
  •  3 Megapixel with 1080p
  •  Day & Night with Adaptive IR LED
  •  Vari-focal Lens with f2.8-12mm / F1.4
  •  Basic WDR (74 dB)
  •  30 fps at 1920 x 1080
  •  Vandal Resistant (IK09)
CAE-62A is an upgrade in July 2014 to include Adaptive IR LED, Digital IO and Audio.

Full Product Specification:
E62A
 
Maximus drivers installed, but no CUDA device detected Print
April 2013
When installing a Maximus style system with a Quadro and Tesla GPU for accellerated 3D CAD, a situation may occur where one or neither of the cards are detected by CUDA programs as a CUDA device.
Register to read more.
 
Series 6: limits to consider when creating a RAID array Print
April 2013
There are limits to the maximum number of drives per array and arrays per controller as listed below:

  • Series 6E (6405E and 6805E):

    Please note that Series 6E RAID controllers support RAID 0, 1, 1E, and 10 only!
    • Maximum Number of Arrays or Simple Volumes Per Controller: 64
    • Maximum Number of Arrays that can be created on the same set of drives: 4
    • Maximum Logical Drive Size: 512TB
    • Maximum Number of Drives in Striped Array (such as RAID 0 or RAID 10):
      6405E: 4
      6805E: 8

      Note: there is no expander support on Series 6E controllers! The maximum number of drives that can be connected is limited to the number of ports available on the controller (four with the 6405E, and eight with the 6805E).
  • All other Series 6 controllers:
    • Maximum Number of Arrays or Simple Volumes Per Controller: 64
    • Maximum Number of Arrays that can be created on the same set of drives: 4
    • Maximum Logical Drive Size: 512TB
    • Maximum Number of Drives in Striped Array (such as RAID 0): 128
    • Maximum Number of Drives in RAID 5 Array: 32
    • Maximum Number of Drives in RAID 50 Array: 32
    • Maximum Number of Drives in RAID 6 Array: 32
    • Maximum Number of Drives in RAID 60 Array: 32
    • Available Stripe Sizes for Arrays are 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, or 1024 KB. Striped RAID configurations have a default stripe size of 256 KB.

    Note: A RAID 10, RAID 50, or RAID 60 array cannot have more than 32 legs when created using the Build method. Maximum disk drive count is only limited by RAID level. For instance:

    • a RAID 10 array built with 32 RAID 1 legs (64 disk drives) is supported
    • a RAID 50 array built with 32 RAID 5 legs (max. 128 disk drives) is also supported
    Although you can create a RAID 10 array with more than 64 drives using the Quick Init method, the maximum number of build/verify operations that can happen at any one time is 32; therefore, such an array could not be verified.


Source: Adaptec Answer ID 17138
 
GTX650 based on Kepler Print
April 2013

Geforce is a consumer brand of video cards targeting the gaming market.  Products under this brand follow a naming convention for its prefix, main code and suffix, presumably decided by the chip designer Nvidia.  Popular prefixes are GT, GTS, and GTX in increasing sequence of performance.  The main code is from 200 to 999 where digit 1 represents the generation, and digits 2&3 represent the positioning in the generation.  Popular suffixes are Ti and Ti Boost in increasing sequence of performance.  The above convention applies in 2013, because we saw 4 digits of the main code and different prefixes and suffices in previous years.

(hover mouse over to enlarge figures)



The product code of GTX650 indicates Generation 6 and middle of the range.  Generation 6 is based on Nvidia Kepler technology whereas Gen 5 is based on Fermi.  Terms like Kepler and Fermi started at the time of Nvidia releasing CUDA which is a framework for heterogeneous parallel computing.  For example, Fermi corresponds to CUDA 2 and Kepler corresponds to CUDA 3. 

A comparison of the hardware spec is shown in the table.  The newer card is certainly more modern for graphics display as shown. 

(Hover mouse over to enlarge)



Performance wise, GTX650 is only marginally higher than GTX550Ti.  The chart was from http://www.geforce.com/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gtx-650/performance

For professional digital content creations such as 3D CAD and video editing, GTX650 is nothing compared to Quadro 2000 which has lesser cores.  We tested both in TSD. Quadro 2000 was tested on a system “ASUS P8Z77-V LX / i3 3220 / 4GB DDR3-1600”, and GTX 650 was tested on “ASUS P8H61MX R2.0/ i3 3220 / 4GB DDR3-1600”.  All tests were done at 1280x960 resolution with 8x FSAA.  Figures of higher value have higher performance.

For scientific computations, GTX650 showed a pleasant performance under Single Precision.  Lower figure means higher performance.  GTX650 out-performs Q2000 on SP.

In summary,

o GTX 650 is more powerful than GTX 550 Ti for gaming applications.
o GTX 650 is not suitable for professional CAD applications
o GTX 650 can be considered for scientific applications on SP   

END

 

Click here to return

 
GTX650 based on Kepler Print
April 2013

Geforce is a consumer brand of video cards targeting the gaming market.  Products under this brand follow a naming convention for its prefix, main code and suffix, presumably decided by the chip designer Nvidia.  Popular prefixes are GT, GTS, and GTX in increasing sequence of performance.  The main code is from 200 to 999 where digit 1 represents the generation, and digits 2&3 represent the positioning in the generation.  Popular suffixes are Ti and Ti Boost in increasing sequence of performance.  The above convention applies in 2013, because we saw 4 digits of the main code and different prefixes and suffices in previous years.

(hover mouse over to enlarge figures)



The product code of GTX650 indicates Generation 6 and middle of the range.  Generation 6 is based on Nvidia Kepler technology whereas Gen 5 is based on Fermi.  Terms like Kepler and Fermi started at the time of Nvidia releasing CUDA which is a framework for heterogeneous parallel computing.  For example, Fermi corresponds to CUDA 2 and Kepler corresponds to CUDA 3. 

A comparison of the hardware spec is shown in the table.  The newer card is certainly more modern for graphics display as shown. 

(Hover mouse over to enlarge)



Performance wise, GTX650 is only marginally higher than GTX550Ti.  The chart was from http://www.geforce.com/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gtx-650/performance

For professional digital content creations such as 3D CAD and video editing, GTX650 is nothing compared to Quadro 2000 which has lesser cores.  We tested both in TSD. Quadro 2000 was tested on a system “ASUS P8Z77-V LX / i3 3220 / 4GB DDR3-1600”, and GTX 650 was tested on “ASUS P8H61MX R2.0/ i3 3220 / 4GB DDR3-1600”.  All tests were done at 1280x960 resolution with 8x FSAA.  Figures of higher value have higher performance.

For scientific computations, GTX650 showed a pleasant performance under Single Precision.  Lower figure means higher performance.  GTX650 out-performs Q2000 on SP.

In summary,

o GTX 650 is more powerful than GTX 550 Ti for gaming applications.
o GTX 650 is not suitable for professional CAD applications
o GTX 650 can be considered for scientific applications on SP   

END

 

Click here to return

 
<< Start < Prev 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 Next > End >>

Results 955 - 963 of 2511